China, Macao SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated

China, Macao SAR
1,973 kg
in 2023
Serbia and Montenegro
2,408 kg
in 2005
China, Macao SAR rank
51st
Serbia and Montenegro rank
48th

Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Serbia and Montenegro
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 2,408 kg against 1,973 kg in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 435 kg.

That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times China, Macao SAR's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.

China, Macao SAR ranks 51st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 48th of 193 countries.

Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Serbia and Montenegro Difference Ahead
1990s 815.59 kg 6,631 kg 5,815 kg Serbia and Montenegro
2000s 1,143 kg 3,936 kg 2,792 kg Serbia and Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — losses from manure treated, China, Macao SAR or Serbia and Montenegro?
Serbia and Montenegro, at 2,408 kg against 1,973 kg in China, Macao SAR as of 2005.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — losses from manure treated between China, Macao SAR and Serbia and Montenegro?
435 kg, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Serbia and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
How do China, Macao SAR and Serbia and Montenegro rank globally for chickens, broilers — losses from manure treated?
China, Macao SAR ranks 51st and Serbia and Montenegro ranks 48th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/serbia-and-montenegro/">China, Macao SAR vs Serbia and Montenegro: Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).