How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Solomon Islands?

56 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Chickens, broilers: Manure applied to soils (N content) … unit GDP

Eswatini

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Solomon Islands

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Eswatini rank

94th

Solomon Islands rank

91st

Chickens, broilers: Manure applied to soils (N content) … unit GDP over time

Eswatini
Solomon Islands

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Eswatini ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 91st of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Solomon Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Solomon Islands	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0007 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0005 kg per US$ of GDP	Solomon Islands
1970s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Solomon Islands
1980s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Solomon Islands
1990s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Solomon Islands
2000s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Solomon Islands
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of, Eswatini or Solomon Islands?: Solomon Islands, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of between Eswatini and Solomon Islands?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Solomon Islands?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Solomon Islands rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of?: Eswatini ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 91st of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/eswatini/solomon-islands/">Eswatini vs Solomon Islands: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 9,049 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.