Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils

Belarus
36.10 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
79.08 million kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
21st
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
11th

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Belarus
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 79.08 million kg against 36.10 million kg in Belarus, a difference of 42.98 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.2 times Belarus's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 21st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 190 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 6.40 million kg 28.54 million kg 22.14 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 6.10 million kg 38.73 million kg 32.63 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 23.71 million kg 60.75 million kg 37.04 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 32.10 million kg 77.10 million kg 45.01 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils, Belarus or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 79.08 million kg against 36.10 million kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils between Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
42.98 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils?
Belarus ranks 21st and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 11th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/belarus/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Belarus vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).