Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils

Central African Republic
443,178 kg
in 2023
Saudi Arabia
19.13 million kg
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
37th
Saudi Arabia rank
38th

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Saudi Arabia
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M196119922023

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 19.13 million kg against 443,178 kg in Central African Republic, a difference of 18.68 million kg.

That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 43.2 times Central African Republic's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 37th and Saudi Arabia ranks 38th of 37 groups.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 46,038 kg 194,970 kg 148,932 kg Saudi Arabia
1970s 66,446 kg 658,918 kg 592,472 kg Saudi Arabia
1980s 121,666 kg 4.42 million kg 4.29 million kg Saudi Arabia
1990s 197,779 kg 8.67 million kg 8.47 million kg Saudi Arabia
2000s 310,327 kg 12.77 million kg 12.46 million kg Saudi Arabia
2010s 415,235 kg 16.60 million kg 16.18 million kg Saudi Arabia
2020s 444,208 kg 18.53 million kg 18.09 million kg Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils, Central African Republic or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 19.13 million kg against 443,178 kg in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils between Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia?
18.68 million kg, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Saudi Arabia rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils?
Central African Republic ranks 37th and Saudi Arabia ranks 38th of 37 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-african-republic/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/central-african-republic/saudi-arabia/">Central African Republic vs Saudi Arabia: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).