Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches

Canada
14.01 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
143,293 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
14th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches over time

  • Canada
  • United Republic of Tanzania
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 14.01 million kg against 143,293 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 13.87 million kg.

That makes Canada's figure about 97.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 193 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 4.91 million kg 64,496 kg 4.85 million kg Canada
1970s 6.68 million kg 106,072 kg 6.58 million kg Canada
1980s 7.73 million kg 137,188 kg 7.59 million kg Canada
1990s 11.06 million kg 246,962 kg 10.81 million kg Canada
2000s 13.98 million kg 369,590 kg 13.61 million kg Canada
2010s 14.24 million kg 393,253 kg 13.84 million kg Canada
2020s 14.04 million kg 222,643 kg 13.82 million kg Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that leaches, Canada or United Republic of Tanzania?
Canada, at 14.01 million kg against 143,293 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that leaches between Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
13.87 million kg, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Canada ranks 14th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).