How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Philippines?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Philippines: Chickens, broilers: Manure applied … applied capita volatilises

Eswatini

0.0193 kg per person

in 2023

Philippines

0.0198 kg per person

in 2023

Eswatini rank

117th

Philippines rank

115th

Chickens, broilers: Manure applied … applied capita volatilises over time

Eswatini
Philippines

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.0198 kg per person against 0.0193 kg per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0005 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Philippines ahead.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Philippines ranks 115th of 168 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Philippines	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0086 kg per person	0.0483 kg per person	0.0397 kg per person	Philippines
1970s	0.01 kg per person	0.0196 kg per person	0.0096 kg per person	Philippines
1980s	0.0133 kg per person	0.0133 kg per person	0 kg per person	Philippines
1990s	0.0138 kg per person	0.0322 kg per person	0.0184 kg per person	Philippines
2000s	0.0174 kg per person	0.0325 kg per person	0.0151 kg per person	Philippines
2010s	0.0197 kg per person	0.032 kg per person	0.0123 kg per person	Philippines
2020s	0.02 kg per person	0.0206 kg per person	0.0006 kg per person	Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n), Eswatini or Philippines?: Philippines, at 0.0198 kg per person against 0.0193 kg per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n) between Eswatini and Philippines?: 0.0005 kg per person, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Philippines?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Philippines rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n)?: Eswatini ranks 117th and Philippines ranks 115th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Philippines: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/eswatini/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/eswatini/philippines/">Eswatini vs Philippines: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 170 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.