Belarus, Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Belarus, Republic of
7.22 million kg
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa
15.03 million kg
in 2023
Belarus, Republic of rank
21st
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
15th

Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Belarus, Republic of
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
05.0M10.0M15.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 15.03 million kg against 7.22 million kg in Belarus, Republic of, a difference of 7.81 million kg.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 2.1 times Belarus, Republic of's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Belarus, Republic of ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 15th of 190 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus, Republic of Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.28 million kg 6.03 million kg 4.75 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 1.22 million kg 7.85 million kg 6.63 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 4.74 million kg 11.16 million kg 6.41 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 6.42 million kg 14.21 million kg 7.79 million kg Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Belarus, Republic of or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 15.03 million kg against 7.22 million kg in Belarus, Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Belarus, Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa?
7.81 million kg, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus, Republic of and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Belarus, Republic of ranks 21st and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 15th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus, Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/sub-saharan-africa/">Belarus, Republic of vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).