Canada vs Eswatini: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Canada
98,195 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
101,506 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
123rd
Eswatini rank
121st

Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Canada
  • Eswatini
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 101,506 kg against 98,195 kg in Canada, a difference of 3,311 kg.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 123rd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 6 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 34,418 kg 14,342 kg 20,076 kg Canada
1970s 46,825 kg 21,577 kg 25,248 kg Canada
1980s 54,155 kg 40,321 kg 13,833 kg Canada
1990s 77,465 kg 56,724 kg 20,741 kg Canada
2000s 97,954 kg 79,999 kg 17,955 kg Canada
2010s 99,738 kg 96,039 kg 3,699 kg Canada
2020s 98,369 kg 103,540 kg 5,171 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Canada or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 101,506 kg against 98,195 kg in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Canada and Eswatini?
3,311 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Eswatini rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Canada ranks 123rd and Eswatini ranks 121st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Eswatini: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/canada/eswatini/">Canada vs Eswatini: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).