Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Cuba
620,757 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
645,038 kg
in 2023
Cuba rank
82nd
Zimbabwe rank
80th

Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Cuba
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 645,038 kg against 620,757 kg in Cuba, a difference of 24,281 kg.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Cuba ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 159,217 kg 240,399 kg 81,182 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 305,240 kg 284,732 kg 20,507 kg Cuba
1980s 503,824 kg 288,303 kg 215,521 kg Cuba
1990s 583,672 kg 596,744 kg 13,072 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 585,778 kg 1.17 million kg 584,721 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 612,620 kg 614,346 kg 1,726 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 618,587 kg 658,356 kg 39,768 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 645,038 kg against 620,757 kg in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
24,281 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Cuba ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 80th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).