How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Madagascar?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Eswatini vs Madagascar: Chickens, broilers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … capita

Eswatini

0.0967 kg per person

in 2023

Madagascar

0.0907 kg per person

in 2023

Eswatini rank

117th

Madagascar rank

119th

Chickens, broilers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … capita over time

Eswatini
Madagascar

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0967 kg per person against 0.0907 kg per person in Madagascar, a difference of 0.006 kg per person.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 117th and Madagascar ranks 119th of 168 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Eswatini	Madagascar	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0432 kg per person	0.0378 kg per person	0.0054 kg per person	Eswatini
1970s	0.0498 kg per person	0.0409 kg per person	0.0089 kg per person	Eswatini
1980s	0.0666 kg per person	0.0368 kg per person	0.0298 kg per person	Eswatini
1990s	0.0689 kg per person	0.0627 kg per person	0.0062 kg per person	Eswatini
2000s	0.087 kg per person	0.0754 kg per person	0.0116 kg per person	Eswatini
2010s	0.0987 kg per person	0.0812 kg per person	0.0175 kg per person	Eswatini
2020s	0.1002 kg per person	0.09 kg per person	0.0102 kg per person	Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content), Eswatini or Madagascar?: Eswatini, at 0.0967 kg per person against 0.0907 kg per person in Madagascar as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content) between Eswatini and Madagascar?: 0.006 kg per person, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Madagascar?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Madagascar rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content)?: Eswatini ranks 117th and Madagascar ranks 119th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Madagascar: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/eswatini/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/eswatini/madagascar/">Eswatini vs Madagascar: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 170 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.