How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?

27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China vs Latvia: Chickens, broilers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … unit

China

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Latvia

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

China rank

101st

Latvia rank

104th

Chickens, broilers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … unit over time

China
Latvia

How they compare

China currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

China ranks 101st and Latvia ranks 104th of 167 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China	Latvia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0004 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2000s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	China
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content), China or Latvia?: China, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content) between China and Latvia?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?: 27 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do China and Latvia rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure management (manure treated, n content)?: China ranks 101st and Latvia ranks 104th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Latvia: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/china/latvia/">China vs Latvia: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 9,049 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.