Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management

Canada
48.61 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
477,643 kg
in 2023
Canada rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th

Chickens, broilers — Manure management over time

  • Canada
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 48.61 million kg against 477,643 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 48.13 million kg.

That makes Canada's figure about 101.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 193 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 17.04 million kg 214,986 kg 16.82 million kg Canada
1970s 23.18 million kg 353,574 kg 22.82 million kg Canada
1980s 26.81 million kg 457,293 kg 26.35 million kg Canada
1990s 38.35 million kg 823,205 kg 37.52 million kg Canada
2000s 48.49 million kg 1.23 million kg 47.26 million kg Canada
2010s 49.37 million kg 1.31 million kg 48.06 million kg Canada
2020s 48.69 million kg 742,144 kg 47.95 million kg Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure management, Canada or United Republic of Tanzania?
Canada, at 48.61 million kg against 477,643 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure management between Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
48.13 million kg, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure management?
Canada ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/canada/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Canada vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).