Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management

Micronesia
230,986 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
477,643 kg
in 2023
Micronesia rank
17th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
15th

Chickens, broilers — Manure management over time

  • Micronesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 477,643 kg against 230,986 kg in Micronesia, a difference of 246,657 kg.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 2.1 times Micronesia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Micronesia ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 20 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 26,872 kg 214,986 kg 188,114 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 37,680 kg 353,574 kg 315,894 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 56,467 kg 457,293 kg 400,826 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 113,958 kg 823,205 kg 709,247 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 163,758 kg 1.23 million kg 1.07 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 212,584 kg 1.31 million kg 1.10 million kg United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 230,372 kg 742,144 kg 511,771 kg United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers — manure management, Micronesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 477,643 kg against 230,986 kg in Micronesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers — manure management between Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
246,657 kg, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Micronesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, broilers — manure management?
Micronesia ranks 17th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 15th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/micronesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Micronesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, broilers — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).