Australia and New Zealand vs Middle Africa: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks

Australia and New Zealand
113.26 million An
in 2023
Middle Africa
75.74 million An
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
31st
Middle Africa rank
28th

Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Middle Africa
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 113.26 million An against 75.74 million An in Middle Africa, a difference of 37.52 million An.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.5 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Middle Africa ranks 28th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 6 and Middle Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 7.76 million An 11.74 million An 3.98 million An Middle Africa
1970s 24.73 million An 22.40 million An 2.33 million An Australia and New Zealand
1980s 41.06 million An 33.80 million An 7.25 million An Australia and New Zealand
1990s 67.30 million An 54.49 million An 12.81 million An Australia and New Zealand
2000s 89.08 million An 65.72 million An 23.36 million An Australia and New Zealand
2010s 98.36 million An 93.02 million An 5.35 million An Australia and New Zealand
2020s 112.06 million An 74.09 million An 37.97 million An Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers β€” stocks, Australia and New Zealand or Middle Africa?
Australia and New Zealand, at 113.26 million An against 75.74 million An in Middle Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers β€” stocks between Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa?
37.52 million An, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Middle Africa rank globally for chickens, broilers β€” stocks?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 31st and Middle Africa ranks 28th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Middle Africa: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-stocks/australia-and-new-zealand/middle-africa/">Australia and New Zealand vs Middle Africa: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).