China, Hong Kong SAR vs Syrian Arab Republic: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
4.19 million An
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
5.51 million An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
136th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
133rd

Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Syrian Arab Republic
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 5.51 million An against 4.19 million An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1.33 million An.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 133rd of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 3 and Syrian Arab Republic in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1960s 2.32 million An 1.81 million An 514,222 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 4.62 million An 3.32 million An 1.30 million An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 5.97 million An 4.84 million An 1.13 million An China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 3.46 million An 6.31 million An 2.85 million An Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 998,000 An 8.82 million An 7.82 million An Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 2.67 million An 6.65 million An 3.98 million An Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 4.19 million An 5.65 million An 1.46 million An Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, broilers β€” stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 5.51 million An against 4.19 million An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, broilers β€” stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Syrian Arab Republic?
1.33 million An, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Syrian Arab Republic?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for chickens, broilers β€” stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 133rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Syrian Arab Republic: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-broilers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/syrian-arab-republic-2/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Syrian Arab Republic: Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, broilers β€” Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).