Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure

Equatorial Guinea
29,092 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
32,324 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
185th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
184th

Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 32,324 kg against 29,092 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3,232 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 184th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 10,535 kg 11,852 kg 1,317 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 15,623 kg 16,970 kg 1,347 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 24,890 kg 22,142 kg 2,748 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 32,540 kg 33,994 kg 1,455 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 33,563 kg 52,635 kg 19,071 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 33,186 kg 45,093 kg 11,906 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 29,092 kg 32,324 kg 3,232 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — amount excreted in manure, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 32,324 kg against 29,092 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — amount excreted in manure between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
3,232 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for chickens, layers — amount excreted in manure?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 185th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 184th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-amount-excreted-in-manure-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Amount excreted in manure (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).