China, Macao SAR vs Latvia: Chickens, layers: Losses from manure treated (N content) … annual
China, Macao SAR
0.9176 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia
1.23 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
38th
Latvia rank
35th
Chickens, layers: Losses from manure treated (N content) … annual over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 1.23 % change on previous year against 0.9176 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 0.3124 % change on previous year.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.3 times China, Macao SAR's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.
China, Macao SAR ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 67 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.59 % change on previous year | -0.6803 % change on previous year | 5.27 % change on previous year | China, Macao SAR |
| 2000s | -2.76 % change on previous year | -0.2972 % change on previous year | 2.47 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | 3 % change on previous year | 2.53 % change on previous year | 0.4755 % change on previous year | China, Macao SAR |
| 2020s | 0.3059 % change on previous year | 1.85 % change on previous year | 1.55 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual, China, Macao SAR or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 1.23 % change on previous year against 0.9176 % change on previous year in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual between China, Macao SAR and Latvia?
- 0.3124 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Latvia rank globally for chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 35th of 67 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.