Latvia vs OECD: Chickens, layers: Losses from manure treated (N content) … annual

Latvia
1.23 % change on previous year
in 2023
OECD
1.27 % change on previous year
in 2023
Latvia rank
35th
OECD rank
34th

Chickens, layers: Losses from manure treated (N content) … annual over time

  • Latvia
  • OECD
-40-2002040196219922023

How they compare

OECD currently reports 1.27 % change on previous year against 1.23 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.04 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1993 it was OECD ahead.

Latvia ranks 35th and OECD ranks 34th of 67 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and OECD in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia OECD Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6803 % change on previous year 1.72 % change on previous year 2.4 % change on previous year OECD
2000s -0.2972 % change on previous year 0.472 % change on previous year 0.7692 % change on previous year OECD
2010s 2.53 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Latvia
2020s 1.85 % change on previous year -1.42 % change on previous year 3.27 % change on previous year Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual, Latvia or OECD?
OECD, at 1.27 % change on previous year against 1.23 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual between Latvia and OECD?
0.04 % change on previous year, with OECD ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and OECD?
28 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Latvia and OECD rank globally for chickens, layers — losses from manure treated (n content), annual?
Latvia ranks 35th and OECD ranks 34th of 67 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs OECD: Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/latvia/oecd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-annual-growth-rate/latvia/oecd/">Latvia vs OECD: Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
88 places, 4,720 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.