China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated

China, Macao SAR
456.31 kg
in 2023
Estonia
1,045 kg
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
59th
Estonia rank
57th

Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 1,045 kg against 456.31 kg in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 588.69 kg.

That makes Estonia's figure about 2.3 times China, Macao SAR's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 59th and Estonia ranks 57th of 193 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 707.8 kg 2,044 kg 1,336 kg Estonia
2000s 759.14 kg 1,234 kg 475.34 kg Estonia
2010s 496.14 kg 1,024 kg 527.68 kg Estonia
2020s 453.2 kg 949.23 kg 496.03 kg Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — losses from manure treated, China, Macao SAR or Estonia?
Estonia, at 1,045 kg against 456.31 kg in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — losses from manure treated between China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
588.69 kg, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Estonia rank globally for chickens, layers — losses from manure treated?
China, Macao SAR ranks 59th and Estonia ranks 57th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/estonia/">China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).