Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

Australia and New Zealand
10.73 million kg
in 2023
Czechoslovakia
12.29 million kg
in 1992
Australia and New Zealand rank
33rd
Czechoslovakia rank
31st

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Czechoslovakia
02.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922023

How they compare

Czechoslovakia currently reports 12.29 million kg against 10.73 million kg in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.55 million kg.

That makes Czechoslovakia's figure about 1.1 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 33rd and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 193 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Czechoslovakia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Czechoslovakia Difference Ahead
1960s 9.68 million kg 6.55 million kg 3.12 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1970s 11.04 million kg 9.94 million kg 1.09 million kg Australia and New Zealand
1980s 9.27 million kg 11.75 million kg 2.48 million kg Czechoslovakia
1990s 7.82 million kg 12.25 million kg 4.43 million kg Czechoslovakia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, Australia and New Zealand or Czechoslovakia?
Czechoslovakia, at 12.29 million kg against 10.73 million kg in Australia and New Zealand as of 1992.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia?
1.55 million kg, with Czechoslovakia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Czechoslovakia rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 33rd and Czechoslovakia ranks 31st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/czechoslovakia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/australia-and-new-zealand/czechoslovakia/">Australia and New Zealand vs Czechoslovakia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).