China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

China, Hong Kong SAR
8,765 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
5,527 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
186th
Equatorial Guinea rank
189th

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Equatorial Guinea
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 8,765 kg against 5,527 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 3,238 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.6 times Equatorial Guinea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, China, Hong Kong SAR has been ahead every year.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 186th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th of 193 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 129,199 kg 2,002 kg 127,197 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 190,780 kg 2,968 kg 187,811 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 116,279 kg 4,729 kg 111,550 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 73,858 kg 6,183 kg 67,675 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 25,418 kg 6,377 kg 19,041 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 19,779 kg 6,305 kg 13,474 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 8,911 kg 5,527 kg 3,383 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, China, Hong Kong SAR or Equatorial Guinea?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 8,765 kg against 5,527 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
3,238 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 186th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).