Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

Equatorial Guinea
5,527 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
6,142 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
189th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
187th

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 6,142 kg against 5,527 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 615 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 187th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 2,002 kg 2,252 kg 250.21 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 2,968 kg 3,224 kg 255.9 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 4,729 kg 4,207 kg 522.04 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 6,183 kg 6,459 kg 276.37 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 6,377 kg 10,001 kg 3,624 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 6,305 kg 8,568 kg 2,262 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 5,527 kg 6,142 kg 614.17 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 6,142 kg against 5,527 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
615 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 189th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 187th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).