Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of vs Zambia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
1.08 million kg
in 2023
Zambia
1.15 million kg
in 2023
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of rank
100th
Zambia rank
97th

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of
  • Zambia
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.15 million kg against 1.08 million kg in Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of, a difference of 71,650 kg.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ahead.

Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 100th and Zambia ranks 97th of 190 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 670,608 kg 723,836 kg 53,227 kg Zambia
2000s 861,989 kg 955,025 kg 93,036 kg Zambia
2010s 1.02 million kg 1.15 million kg 127,461 kg Zambia
2020s 1.08 million kg 1.14 million kg 62,285 kg Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.15 million kg against 1.08 million kg in Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Zambia?
71,650 kg, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Zambia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of and Zambia rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of ranks 100th and Zambia ranks 97th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of vs Zambia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/ethiopia/zambia/">Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of vs Zambia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).