Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

Mexico
67.72 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.45 million kg
in 2023
Mexico rank
9th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Mexico
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020.0M40.0M60.0M196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 67.72 million kg against 3.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 64.27 million kg.

That makes Mexico's figure about 19.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 193 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 9.52 million kg 540,555 kg 8.98 million kg Mexico
1970s 10.02 million kg 856,973 kg 9.16 million kg Mexico
1980s 25.87 million kg 1.05 million kg 24.82 million kg Mexico
1990s 39.58 million kg 1.36 million kg 38.22 million kg Mexico
2000s 52.04 million kg 1.35 million kg 50.69 million kg Mexico
2010s 61.13 million kg 1.59 million kg 59.54 million kg Mexico
2020s 66.47 million kg 2.98 million kg 63.48 million kg Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, Mexico or United Republic of Tanzania?
Mexico, at 67.72 million kg against 3.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
64.27 million kg, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
Mexico ranks 9th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mexico/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/mexico/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Mexico vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).