Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils

Middle Africa
6.06 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.45 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
02.0M4.0M6.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 6.06 million kg against 3.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.62 million kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 659,396 kg 540,555 kg 118,840 kg Middle Africa
1970s 830,841 kg 856,973 kg 26,132 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 1.02 million kg 1.05 million kg 30,290 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 1.26 million kg 1.36 million kg 91,605 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 1.49 million kg 1.35 million kg 141,472 kg Middle Africa
2010s 2.45 million kg 1.59 million kg 861,494 kg Middle Africa
2020s 5.17 million kg 2.98 million kg 2.19 million kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 6.06 million kg against 3.45 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.62 million kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils?
Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).