Botswana vs Mauritania: Chickens, layers: Manure applied … applied square kilometre leaches

Botswana
0.0373 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.0522 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
165th
Mauritania rank
162nd

Chickens, layers: Manure applied … applied square kilometre leaches over time

  • Botswana
  • Mauritania
0.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.0522 kg per square kilometre against 0.0373 kg per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0149 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.4 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Botswana ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 162nd of 168 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0088 kg per square kilometre 0.0306 kg per square kilometre 0.0218 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
1970s 0.0153 kg per square kilometre 0.0335 kg per square kilometre 0.0183 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
1980s 0.0226 kg per square kilometre 0.0338 kg per square kilometre 0.0112 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
1990s 0.0289 kg per square kilometre 0.0439 kg per square kilometre 0.0151 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.042 kg per square kilometre 0.0478 kg per square kilometre 0.0058 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
2010s 0.041 kg per square kilometre 0.0506 kg per square kilometre 0.0095 kg per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 0.0373 kg per square kilometre 0.0518 kg per square kilometre 0.0145 kg per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content), Botswana or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.0522 kg per square kilometre against 0.0373 kg per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content) between Botswana and Mauritania?
0.0149 kg per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Mauritania rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that leaches (n content)?
Botswana ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 162nd of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Mauritania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content-per-square-kilometre/botswana/mauritania/">Botswana vs Mauritania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.