How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and New Caledonia?

59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Canada vs New Caledonia: Chickens, layers: Manure applied … applied unit GDP volatilises

Canada

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

New Caledonia

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Canada rank

133rd

New Caledonia rank

135th

Chickens, layers: Manure applied … applied unit GDP volatilises over time

Canada
New Caledonia

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Canada ranks 133rd and New Caledonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Canada	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1970s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Canada
1980s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1990s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2000s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Canada
2020s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n), Canada or New Caledonia?: Canada, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n) between Canada and New Caledonia?: 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and New Caledonia?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Canada and New Caledonia rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n)?: Canada ranks 133rd and New Caledonia ranks 135th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs New Caledonia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/canada/new-caledonia/">Canada vs New Caledonia: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 169 places, 9,049 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 09 October 2026

Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.