Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers: Manure applied to soils … applied volatilises

Middle Africa
1.21 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
689,583 kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
8th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
10th

Chickens, layers: Manure applied to soils … applied volatilises over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 1.21 million kg against 689,583 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 522,997 kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.8 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 4 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 131,879 kg 108,111 kg 23,768 kg Middle Africa
1970s 166,168 kg 171,395 kg 5,227 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 203,782 kg 209,839 kg 6,058 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1990s 252,996 kg 271,317 kg 18,321 kg United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 298,473 kg 270,179 kg 28,294 kg Middle Africa
2010s 490,369 kg 318,069 kg 172,299 kg Middle Africa
2020s 1.03 million kg 596,988 kg 437,376 kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 1.21 million kg against 689,583 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
522,997 kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens, layers — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Middle Africa ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 10th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).