Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Equatorial Guinea
4,713 kg
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
5,237 kg
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
166th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
164th

Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 5,237 kg against 4,713 kg in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 524 kg.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,707 kg 1,920 kg 213.34 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 2,531 kg 2,749 kg 218.19 kg Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 4,032 kg 3,587 kg 445.11 kg Equatorial Guinea
1990s 5,271 kg 5,507 kg 235.64 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 5,437 kg 8,527 kg 3,090 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 5,376 kg 7,305 kg 1,929 kg Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 4,713 kg 5,237 kg 523.66 kg Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 5,237 kg against 4,713 kg in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
524 kg, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for chickens, layers — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 166th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 164th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).