Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens, layers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … square

Eswatini
1.21 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
1.14 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
143rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
144th

Chickens, layers: Manure management (manure treated, N) … square over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.21 kg per square kilometre against 1.14 kg per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.07 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 143rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th of 168 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 6 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4946 kg per square kilometre 0.1262 kg per square kilometre 0.3684 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.6463 kg per square kilometre 0.1765 kg per square kilometre 0.4698 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.6582 kg per square kilometre 0.3185 kg per square kilometre 0.3397 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.4612 kg per square kilometre 0.5136 kg per square kilometre 0.0524 kg per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 1.3 kg per square kilometre 0.8711 kg per square kilometre 0.4293 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 1.25 kg per square kilometre 1.1 kg per square kilometre 0.1545 kg per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 1.22 kg per square kilometre 1.13 kg per square kilometre 0.0807 kg per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — manure management (manure treated, n content), per, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Eswatini, at 1.21 kg per square kilometre against 1.14 kg per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — manure management (manure treated, n content), per between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
0.07 kg per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chickens, layers — manure management (manure treated, n content), per?
Eswatini ranks 143rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 144th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens, layers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens, layers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Manure management (manure treated, N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,696 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Chickens, layers — Manure management (manure treated, N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.