Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cuba: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
3.05 million kg
in 2023
Cuba
3.06 million kg
in 2023
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
62nd
Cuba rank
61st

Chickens, layers β€” Manure management over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Cuba
1.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 3.06 million kg against 3.05 million kg in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 12,760 kg.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 61st of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Cuba Difference Ahead
1960s 1.53 million kg 1.47 million kg 56,528 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1970s 1.54 million kg 2.19 million kg 651,083 kg Cuba
1980s 1.63 million kg 2.80 million kg 1.17 million kg Cuba
1990s 1.77 million kg 3.01 million kg 1.24 million kg Cuba
2000s 2.69 million kg 2.52 million kg 172,836 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2010s 2.82 million kg 3.36 million kg 537,249 kg Cuba
2020s 3.00 million kg 3.05 million kg 44,015 kg Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers β€” manure management, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Cuba?
Cuba, at 3.06 million kg against 3.05 million kg in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers β€” manure management between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cuba?
12,760 kg, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cuba?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Cuba rank globally for chickens, layers β€” manure management?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 62nd and Cuba ranks 61st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cuba: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/afghanistan/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/afghanistan/cuba/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Cuba: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).