Eswatini, Kingdom of vs St. Lucia: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management

Eswatini, Kingdom of
20,882 kg
in 2023
St. Lucia
27,810 kg
in 2023
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
181st
St. Lucia rank
178th

Chickens, layers β€” Manure management over time

  • Eswatini, Kingdom of
  • St. Lucia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

St. Lucia currently reports 27,810 kg against 20,882 kg in Eswatini, Kingdom of, a difference of 6,928 kg.

That makes St. Lucia's figure about 1.3 times Eswatini, Kingdom of's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was St. Lucia ahead.

Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 181st and St. Lucia ranks 178th of 190 countries.

St. Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini, Kingdom of St. Lucia Difference Ahead
1960s 8,507 kg 14,374 kg 5,866 kg St. Lucia
1970s 11,116 kg 17,655 kg 6,538 kg St. Lucia
1980s 11,321 kg 20,436 kg 9,114 kg St. Lucia
1990s 7,933 kg 21,342 kg 13,409 kg St. Lucia
2000s 22,366 kg 31,341 kg 8,975 kg St. Lucia
2010s 21,547 kg 24,248 kg 2,701 kg St. Lucia
2020s 20,907 kg 25,388 kg 4,481 kg St. Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers β€” manure management, Eswatini, Kingdom of or St. Lucia?
St. Lucia, at 27,810 kg against 20,882 kg in Eswatini, Kingdom of as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers β€” manure management between Eswatini, Kingdom of and St. Lucia?
6,928 kg, with St. Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini, Kingdom of and St. Lucia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini, Kingdom of and St. Lucia rank globally for chickens, layers β€” manure management?
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 181st and St. Lucia ranks 178th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini, Kingdom of vs St. Lucia: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/eswatini/st-lucia/">Eswatini, Kingdom of vs St. Lucia: Chickens, layers β€” Manure management</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers β€” Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).