Estonia vs Pakistan: Chickens, layers — Stocks, per capita
Estonia
0.4838 An per person
in 2023
Pakistan
0.4848 An per person
in 2023
Estonia rank
105th
Pakistan rank
104th
Chickens, layers — Stocks, per capita over time
- Estonia
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0.4848 An per person against 0.4838 An per person in Estonia, a difference of 0.001 An per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 105th and Pakistan ranks 104th of 168 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8936 An per person | 0.3661 An per person | 0.5275 An per person | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.5738 An per person | 0.4554 An per person | 0.1184 An per person | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.4916 An per person | 0.4008 An per person | 0.0908 An per person | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.4475 An per person | 0.462 An per person | 0.0145 An per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens, layers — stocks, per capita, Estonia or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0.4848 An per person against 0.4838 An per person in Estonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in chickens, layers — stocks, per capita between Estonia and Pakistan?
- 0.001 An per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Pakistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Pakistan rank globally for chickens, layers — stocks, per capita?
- Estonia ranks 105th and Pakistan ranks 104th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens, layers — Stocks, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chickens, layers — Stocks divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.