China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Chickens, layers — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
30,000 An
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
54,000 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
188th
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
185th

Chickens, layers — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 54,000 An against 30,000 An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 24,000 An.

That makes Equatorial Guinea, Republic of's figure about 1.8 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 185th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 442,222 An 19,556 An 422,667 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 653,000 An 29,000 An 624,000 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 398,000 An 46,200 An 351,800 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 252,800 An 60,400 An 192,400 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 87,000 An 62,300 An 24,700 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 67,700 An 61,600 An 6,100 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 30,500 An 54,000 An 23,500 An Equatorial Guinea, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 54,000 An against 30,000 An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
24,000 An, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for chickens, layers — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 185th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Chickens, layers — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/equatorial-guinea/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Chickens, layers — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).