China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Chickens, layers — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
30,000 An
in 2023
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
48,000 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
188th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
187th

Chickens, layers — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 48,000 An against 30,000 An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 18,000 An.

That makes Saint Vincent and the Grenadines's figure about 1.6 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 187th of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 6 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
1960s 442,222 An 24,222 An 418,000 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1970s 653,000 An 45,400 An 607,600 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1980s 398,000 An 63,000 An 335,000 An China, Hong Kong SAR
1990s 252,800 An 58,200 An 194,600 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 87,000 An 63,600 An 23,400 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 67,700 An 55,600 An 12,100 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 30,500 An 44,250 An 13,750 An Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens, layers — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 48,000 An against 30,000 An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens, layers — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
18,000 An, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for chickens, layers — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 188th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 187th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Chickens, layers — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-layers-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Chickens, layers — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens, layers — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).