Serbia and Montenegro vs Zambia: Chickens, layers — Stocks
Chickens, layers — Stocks over time
- Serbia and Montenegro
- Zambia
How they compare
Serbia and Montenegro currently reports 12.15 million An against 11.25 million An in Zambia, a difference of 899,000 An.
That makes Serbia and Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Serbia and Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 193 countries.
Serbia and Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia and Montenegro | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.84 million An | 6.90 million An | 8.94 million An | Serbia and Montenegro |
| 2000s | 12.39 million An | 9.14 million An | 3.25 million An | Serbia and Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens, layers — stocks, Serbia and Montenegro or Zambia?
- Serbia and Montenegro, at 12.15 million An against 11.25 million An in Zambia as of 2005.
- What is the difference in chickens, layers — stocks between Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia?
- 899,000 An, with Serbia and Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2005.
- How do Serbia and Montenegro and Zambia rank globally for chickens, layers — stocks?
- Serbia and Montenegro ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens, layers — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).