Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area

Rwanda
0.02 LSU/ha
in 2023
Solomon Islands
0.02 LSU/ha
in 2023
Rwanda rank
142nd
Solomon Islands rank
142nd

Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area over time

  • Rwanda
  • Solomon Islands
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.02 LSU/ha against 0.02 LSU/ha in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 LSU/ha.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Rwanda ranks 142nd and Solomon Islands ranks 142nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0 LSU/ha 0.02 LSU/ha 0.02 LSU/ha Solomon Islands
1970s 0.003 LSU/ha 0.02 LSU/ha 0.017 LSU/ha Solomon Islands
1980s 0.01 LSU/ha 0.02 LSU/ha 0.01 LSU/ha Solomon Islands
1990s 0.01 LSU/ha 0.021 LSU/ha 0.011 LSU/ha Solomon Islands
2000s 0.012 LSU/ha 0.025 LSU/ha 0.013 LSU/ha Solomon Islands
2010s 0.024 LSU/ha 0.021 LSU/ha 0.003 LSU/ha Rwanda
2020s 0.0175 LSU/ha 0.02 LSU/ha 0.0025 LSU/ha Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — livestock units per agricultural land area, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
Rwanda, at 0.02 LSU/ha against 0.02 LSU/ha in Solomon Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — livestock units per agricultural land area between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
0 LSU/ha, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for chickens — livestock units per agricultural land area?
Rwanda ranks 142nd and Solomon Islands ranks 142nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-livestock-units-per-agricultural-land-area/rwanda/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-livestock-units-per-agricultural-land-area/rwanda/solomon-islands/">Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Livestock units per agricultural land area
Unit
LSU/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 13,893 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.