Greece vs Latvia: Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Greece
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Latvia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Greece rank
27th
Latvia rank
28th
Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP over time
- Greece
- Latvia
How they compare
Greece currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Greece ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 167 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chickens — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp, Greece or Latvia?
- Greece, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in chickens — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp between Greece and Latvia?
- 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Greece and Latvia rank globally for chickens — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of gdp?
- Greece ranks 27th and Latvia ranks 28th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.