China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated

China, Macao SAR
2,429 kg
in 2023
Estonia
2,372 kg
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
57th
Estonia rank
58th

Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Estonia
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 2,429 kg against 2,372 kg in Estonia, a difference of 57 kg.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 57th and Estonia ranks 58th of 190 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,523 kg 3,785 kg 2,261 kg Estonia
2000s 2,081 kg 2,317 kg 235.76 kg Estonia
2010s 2,228 kg 2,295 kg 67.24 kg Estonia
2020s 2,373 kg 2,282 kg 90.67 kg China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens β€” losses from manure treated, China, Macao SAR or Estonia?
China, Macao SAR, at 2,429 kg against 2,372 kg in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens β€” losses from manure treated between China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
57 kg, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Estonia rank globally for chickens β€” losses from manure treated?
China, Macao SAR ranks 57th and Estonia ranks 58th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/china-macao-sar/estonia/">China, Macao SAR vs Estonia: Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens β€” Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).