Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Chickens — Losses from manure treated

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
641,319 kg
in 2023
Uzbekistan
302,606 kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th
Uzbekistan rank
16th

Chickens — Losses from manure treated over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 641,319 kg against 302,606 kg in Uzbekistan, a difference of 338,713 kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.1 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 33 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 210,795 kg 67,516 kg 143,279 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 274,786 kg 70,017 kg 204,769 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 495,882 kg 183,134 kg 312,748 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 653,238 kg 281,119 kg 372,120 kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — losses from manure treated, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 641,319 kg against 302,606 kg in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — losses from manure treated between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
338,713 kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for chickens — losses from manure treated?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th and Uzbekistan ranks 16th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Chickens — Losses from manure treated. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Chickens — Losses from manure treated</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Losses from manure treated (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).