Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate

Russian Federation
3.69 % change on previous year
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
3.71 % change on previous year
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
44th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
43rd

Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Russian Federation
  • United Republic of Tanzania
-200204060196219922023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 3.71 % change on previous year against 3.69 % change on previous year in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.02 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 212 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s -7.34 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year 8.86 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2000s 0.4644 % change on previous year 1.21 % change on previous year 0.7416 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 2.8 % change on previous year -0.8324 % change on previous year 3.63 % change on previous year Russian Federation
2020s 0.549 % change on previous year 15.78 % change on previous year 15.23 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate, Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 3.71 % change on previous year against 3.69 % change on previous year in Russian Federation as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.02 % change on previous year, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — manure applied to soils (n content), annual growth rate?
Russian Federation ranks 44th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 43rd of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-annual-growth-rate/russian-federation-2/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
246 places, 13,824 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Chickens — Manure applied to soils (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.