Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils

Eswatini
139,932 kg
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
157,441 kg
in 2023
Eswatini rank
181st
Guinea-Bissau rank
180th

Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 157,441 kg against 139,932 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 17,509 kg.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 181st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 180th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 25,328 kg 17,188 kg 8,140 kg Eswatini
1970s 36,423 kg 24,566 kg 11,857 kg Eswatini
1980s 58,612 kg 44,431 kg 14,180 kg Eswatini
1990s 74,461 kg 70,178 kg 4,283 kg Eswatini
2000s 116,192 kg 101,891 kg 14,300 kg Eswatini
2010s 134,185 kg 141,248 kg 7,063 kg Guinea-Bissau
2020s 142,343 kg 153,879 kg 11,536 kg Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens β€” manure applied to soils, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 157,441 kg against 139,932 kg in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens β€” manure applied to soils between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
17,509 kg, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for chickens β€” manure applied to soils?
Eswatini ranks 181st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 180th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).