Kiribati vs New Caledonia: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils

Kiribati
248,537 kg
in 2023
New Caledonia
228,041 kg
in 2023
Kiribati rank
156th
New Caledonia rank
158th

Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Kiribati
  • New Caledonia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 248,537 kg against 228,041 kg in New Caledonia, a difference of 20,496 kg.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Kiribati ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 158th of 190 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and New Caledonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 44,871 kg 66,530 kg 21,659 kg New Caledonia
1970s 58,861 kg 75,283 kg 16,422 kg New Caledonia
1980s 79,912 kg 108,899 kg 28,987 kg New Caledonia
1990s 110,458 kg 139,719 kg 29,261 kg New Caledonia
2000s 182,448 kg 212,652 kg 30,204 kg New Caledonia
2010s 235,137 kg 209,408 kg 25,729 kg Kiribati
2020s 247,748 kg 232,898 kg 14,851 kg Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens β€” manure applied to soils, Kiribati or New Caledonia?
Kiribati, at 248,537 kg against 228,041 kg in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens β€” manure applied to soils between Kiribati and New Caledonia?
20,496 kg, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and New Caledonia rank globally for chickens β€” manure applied to soils?
Kiribati ranks 156th and New Caledonia ranks 158th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs New Caledonia: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/kiribati/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/kiribati/new-caledonia/">Kiribati vs New Caledonia: Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).