Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)

Middle Africa
3.38 million kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
1.18 million kg
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
10th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content) over time

  • Middle Africa
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 3.38 million kg against 1.18 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 2.20 million kg.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 2.9 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Middle Africa has been ahead every year.

Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 groups.

Middle Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 439,695 kg 226,662 kg 213,033 kg Middle Africa
1970s 710,634 kg 363,164 kg 347,470 kg Middle Africa
1980s 1.00 million kg 451,947 kg 549,932 kg Middle Africa
1990s 1.50 million kg 653,937 kg 847,906 kg Middle Africa
2000s 1.80 million kg 774,858 kg 1.03 million kg Middle Africa
2010s 2.65 million kg 870,357 kg 1.78 million kg Middle Africa
2020s 3.08 million kg 1.12 million kg 1.96 million kg Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure applied to soils that leaches, Middle Africa or United Republic of Tanzania?
Middle Africa, at 3.38 million kg against 1.18 million kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure applied to soils that leaches between Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
2.20 million kg, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — manure applied to soils that leaches?
Middle Africa ranks 10th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-leaches-n-content/middle-africa/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Middle Africa vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).