Botswana vs Eritrea: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Botswana
15,897 kg
in 2023
Eritrea
20,395 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
190th
Eritrea rank
188th

Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Botswana
  • Eritrea
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 20,395 kg against 15,897 kg in Botswana, a difference of 4,498 kg.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.3 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.

Botswana ranks 190th and Eritrea ranks 188th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 27,928 kg 36,697 kg 8,770 kg Eritrea
2000s 25,090 kg 21,319 kg 3,771 kg Botswana
2010s 19,744 kg 21,989 kg 2,245 kg Eritrea
2020s 16,105 kg 20,915 kg 4,810 kg Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Botswana or Eritrea?
Eritrea, at 20,395 kg against 15,897 kg in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Botswana and Eritrea?
4,498 kg, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Eritrea rank globally for chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Botswana ranks 190th and Eritrea ranks 188th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Eritrea: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/botswana/eritrea/">Botswana vs Eritrea: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).