Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Mauritius
239,156 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
284,190 kg
in 2023
Mauritius rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
127th

Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 284,190 kg against 239,156 kg in Mauritius, a difference of 45,034 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 190 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 6,761 kg 113,575 kg 106,814 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 14,265 kg 134,675 kg 120,410 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 36,350 kg 141,429 kg 105,078 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 88,320 kg 216,870 kg 128,550 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 157,084 kg 382,941 kg 225,857 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 211,974 kg 274,779 kg 62,806 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 235,703 kg 290,436 kg 54,733 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 284,190 kg against 239,156 kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
45,034 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Mauritius ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).