Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Melanesia
974,349 kg
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
785,112 kg
in 2023
Melanesia rank
12th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Melanesia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M196119922023

How they compare

Melanesia currently reports 974,349 kg against 785,112 kg in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 189,237 kg.

That makes Melanesia's figure about 1.2 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Republic of Tanzania ahead.

Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 5 and United Republic of Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Melanesia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1960s 126,571 kg 151,108 kg 24,537 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1970s 188,606 kg 242,109 kg 53,503 kg United Republic of Tanzania
1980s 401,302 kg 301,298 kg 100,004 kg Melanesia
1990s 581,267 kg 435,958 kg 145,309 kg Melanesia
2000s 733,571 kg 516,572 kg 217,000 kg Melanesia
2010s 849,066 kg 580,238 kg 268,828 kg Melanesia
2020s 922,267 kg 745,416 kg 176,851 kg Melanesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Melanesia or United Republic of Tanzania?
Melanesia, at 974,349 kg against 785,112 kg in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
189,237 kg, with Melanesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Melanesia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for chickens — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Melanesia ranks 12th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 20 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/melanesia/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Melanesia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).