Belarus vs Eswatini: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Belarus
93,129 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
119,310 kg
in 2023
Belarus rank
126th
Eswatini rank
123rd

Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Belarus
  • Eswatini
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 119,310 kg against 93,129 kg in Belarus, a difference of 26,181 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Eswatini ahead.

Belarus ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 123rd of 193 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 29,195 kg 62,820 kg 33,625 kg Eswatini
2000s 26,153 kg 99,069 kg 72,915 kg Eswatini
2010s 68,018 kg 114,410 kg 46,392 kg Eswatini
2020s 85,288 kg 121,366 kg 36,079 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Belarus or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 119,310 kg against 93,129 kg in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Belarus and Eswatini?
26,181 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Belarus ranks 126th and Eswatini ranks 123rd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eswatini: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/belarus/eswatini/">Belarus vs Eswatini: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).