Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises

Mauritius
1.02 million kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.21 million kg
in 2023
Mauritius rank
71st
Zimbabwe rank
69th

Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.21 million kg against 1.02 million kg in Mauritius, a difference of 191,990 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 193 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 28,824 kg 484,190 kg 455,365 kg Zimbabwe
1970s 60,813 kg 574,139 kg 513,326 kg Zimbabwe
1980s 154,967 kg 602,932 kg 447,966 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 376,521 kg 924,552 kg 548,031 kg Zimbabwe
2000s 669,676 kg 1.63 million kg 962,861 kg Zimbabwe
2010s 903,677 kg 1.17 million kg 267,751 kg Zimbabwe
2020s 1.00 million kg 1.24 million kg 233,335 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.21 million kg against 1.02 million kg in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
191,990 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for chickens — manure left on pasture that volatilises?
Mauritius ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 69th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-left-on-pasture-that-volatilises-n-content/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).