Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Ukraine: Chickens — Manure management

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
128.56 million kg
in 2023
Ukraine
71.86 million kg
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
Ukraine rank
18th

Chickens — Manure management over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Ukraine
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M196119922023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 128.56 million kg against 71.86 million kg in Ukraine, a difference of 56.70 million kg.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.8 times Ukraine's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 18th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 3 and Ukraine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 54.16 million kg 60.40 million kg 6.24 million kg Ukraine
2000s 71.51 million kg 60.98 million kg 10.53 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 103.79 million kg 84.23 million kg 19.55 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 127.14 million kg 81.29 million kg 45.85 million kg Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chickens — manure management, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Ukraine?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 128.56 million kg against 71.86 million kg in Ukraine as of 2023.
What is the difference in chickens — manure management between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Ukraine?
56.70 million kg, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Ukraine rank globally for chickens — manure management?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Ukraine ranks 18th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Ukraine: Chickens — Manure management. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/chickens-manure-management-manure-treated-n-content/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/ukraine/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Ukraine: Chickens — Manure management</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Chickens — Manure management (manure treated, N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
246 places, 14,082 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).